Chapter 12: Life After React - Finding Your New Framework Family
The Framework-Agnostic Developer: Final Form
You’ve made it through the journey. You’ve seen the alternatives. You understand the options.
Here’s what you’ve become: framework-agnostic.
Not anti-React. Not pro-Vue. Not Svelte-evangelist.
You’re a developer who picks the right tool for the job.
Choosing the Right Framework
There’s no one answer. There’s only “it depends.” Here’s the decision tree:
Content-Heavy Sites (Blogs, Docs, Marketing)
Best choices:
- Astro - Zero JS by default, bring frameworks for islands
- HTMX - Server-rendered with sprinkles of interactivity
- Vanilla - Sometimes you just don’t need a framework
Why not React?
- Shipping megabytes of framework for static content
- Slower initial load
- SEO complexity
- Over-engineering
Interactive Widgets & Progressive Enhancement
Best choices:
- Alpine.js - Minimal JavaScript, no build step
- Vanilla Web Components - Standards-based, no dependencies
- Lit - Web Components with better DX
Why not React?
- Too heavy for simple interactions
- Requires build step
- Framework lock-in
SPAs with Moderate Complexity
Best choices:
- Svelte - Smallest bundles, great DX
- Vue - Gentle learning curve, great docs
- Solid - React-like syntax, better performance
Why not React?
- Larger bundles
- More boilerplate
- Performance requires constant optimization
Enterprise Applications
Best choices:
- Angular - Opinionated, structured, batteries included
- Vue - Good balance of flexibility and guidance
- React - Huge ecosystem, large hiring pool
Why not others?
- Smaller communities
- Fewer enterprise-specific libraries
- Harder hiring
Highly Interactive, Real-Time Apps
Best choices:
- React - Battle-tested for complex UIs
- Solid - Fine-grained reactivity shines here
- Svelte - Great performance for games/tools
Why not others?
- HTMX isn’t built for this
- Alpine is too simple
- Vanilla gets messy at scale
Design Systems & Component Libraries
Best choices:
- Lit - Works everywhere, web standards
- Vanilla Web Components - Future-proof
- Framework-specific (Vue, React, Svelte) - If you’re committed to that framework
Why not others?
- Framework lock-in
- Can’t share across teams using different frameworks
When React Is Actually the Right Choice
Let’s be honest: React isn’t always wrong.
React makes sense when:
- You’re building something like Facebook
- Complex, highly interactive
- Real-time updates
- Massive scale
- Your team is all React developers
- Retraining is expensive
- Productivity matters more than bundle size
- You need to ship now
- The ecosystem is critical
- You need that specific React library
- No equivalent exists elsewhere
- Time to market trumps all
- You’re maintaining existing React code
- If it works, don’t break it
- Migration cost exceeds benefit
- Technical debt is manageable
React isn’t evil. It’s just not always the answer.
Moving Forward Without useEffect-Induced PTSD
Recognizing the Patterns
After React, you’ll see patterns everywhere:
Component-based thinking:
- Every framework has components
- The syntax changes, the concept doesn’t
Reactive data:
- React: useState, useReducer
- Vue: ref, reactive
- Svelte: let (it’s just reactive)
- Solid: createSignal
- All solving the same problem differently
Lifecycle management:
- React: useEffect
- Vue: onMounted, onUnmounted
- Svelte: onMount, onDestroy
- Solid: onMount, onCleanup
- Same concept, better APIs
State management:
- All frameworks need it
- Some have better built-in solutions
- Patterns transfer
Your React knowledge isn’t wasted. You learned the problems frameworks solve. Now you’re learning better solutions.
The Multi-Framework Developer
Here’s a radical idea: learn multiple frameworks.
Not to master all of them. But to understand their trade-offs.
Spend a weekend with:
- Vue (learn reactivity done right)
- Svelte (learn compiler-based frameworks)
- HTMX (learn server-driven apps)
- Vanilla (learn what the browser can do)
You’ll become a better developer in your primary framework because you’ll understand what else is possible.
The Framework Portfolio
Different projects, different frameworks:
Personal blog → Astro
Client dashboard → Vue
Marketing site → HTMX + Alpine
Design system → Lit
Side project game → Svelte
Work project → React (because that's what work uses)
Learning experiment → Vanilla
You’re not locked in. You’re well-rounded.
Advice for Your Next Project
1. Question the Default
Don’t reach for React automatically.
Ask:
- How interactive is this really?
- How much JavaScript do users need to download?
- What’s the performance budget?
- Does the team know alternatives?
Then choose.
2. Optimize for Change
Pick frameworks that make change easy:
- Clear reactivity (Vue, Svelte, Solid) over confusing re-renders (React)
- Less boilerplate over more ceremony
- Standard HTML/CSS over framework-specific patterns
- Small bundles over “we’ll optimize later”
Future you will thank past you.
3. Bet on Standards Where Possible
- Web Components won’t go away
- HTML/CSS won’t go away
- JavaScript won’t go away
- Frameworks come and go
Use standards when you can. Framework abstractions when you must.
4. Measure What Matters
Track:
- Bundle size
- Time to interactive
- Developer velocity
- Team happiness
Don’t cargo cult framework choice. Measure and decide.
5. It’s Okay to Be Boring
Sometimes the right choice is:
- The framework your team knows
- The framework with the most docs
- The framework that’s “good enough”
- Not switching at all
Boring is often correct.
Final Thoughts: The Recovery Journey
You picked up this book because something about React frustrated you.
Maybe it was useEffect. Maybe it was the bundle size. Maybe it was the constant feeling that you were holding it wrong.
You’ve now seen that alternatives exist. Better alternatives, for many use cases.
But here’s the real lesson: there is no perfect framework.
- Vue has learning quirks
- Svelte’s compiler can be surprising
- Solid’s reactivity takes getting used to
- Angular is opinionated (which helps until it doesn’t)
- Alpine is too simple for complex apps
- Lit ties you to Web Components
- HTMX requires server rendering
- Vanilla requires you to build everything
Every choice is a trade-off.
The difference between a junior developer and a senior developer isn’t knowing one framework deeply.
It’s knowing:
- When to use which tool
- What trade-offs you’re making
- How to migrate when you chose wrong
- That choosing wrong is part of the job
You Are Not Your Framework
Your value as a developer isn’t:
- How well you know React
- Whether you can recite the Rules of Hooks
- Your ability to optimize re-renders
Your value is:
- Solving problems
- Shipping features
- Understanding trade-offs
- Making good decisions
- Learning and adapting
Frameworks are tools. You are a builder.
Don’t let a tool define you.
The Path Forward
You have options now:
- Stay with React - Now you know why
- Try something new - Now you know what
- Mix and match - Now you know how
- Go vanilla - Now you know the platform
All are valid.
What matters is that you’re choosing instead of defaulting.
One Last Thing
If you take one thing from this book, let it be this:
Question your tools.
Not to be contrarian. Not to chase hype. But to truly understand if they’re serving you or if you’re serving them.
React taught you to think in components. That’s valuable.
Now go build something amazing with whatever framework makes you happiest.
Or no framework at all.
“I used to introduce myself as a React developer. Now I introduce myself as a developer. React is just one tool in my toolbox.” — A Developer Who Stopped Over-Reacting
Thank You
Thank you for reading. Thank you for keeping an open mind. Thank you for caring about your craft enough to question your tools.
Now go forth and build wonderful things.
With less JavaScript. Less framework overhead. Less useEffect-induced anxiety.
And maybe, just maybe, a little more joy.
The End 🎉
Appendix: Quick Reference
Framework Comparison Table
Framework | Size (gzipped) | Reactivity | Learning Curve | Best For |
---|---|---|---|---|
React | ~140KB | Re-renders | Moderate | SPAs, large teams |
Vue | ~35KB | Proxy-based | Gentle | General purpose |
Svelte | ~2KB | Compiler | Gentle | Everything |
Solid | ~7KB | Fine-grained | Moderate | React refugees |
Angular | ~150KB | Zone.js/Signals | Steep | Enterprise |
Alpine | ~15KB | Proxy-based | Easy | Simple interactivity |
Lit | ~5KB | Efficient updates | Moderate | Web Components |
HTMX | ~14KB | Server-driven | Easy | Server-rendered apps |
Astro | ~0KB | Islands | Easy | Content sites |
Vanilla | ~0KB | Manual | Easy-Hard | Anything |
When to Use What
Content sites → Astro, HTMX, Vanilla
Simple interactions → Alpine, Vanilla
SPAs → Svelte, Vue, Solid
Enterprise → Angular, React
Design systems → Lit, Web Components
Learning → Vue, Svelte
Performance-critical → Svelte, Solid, Vanilla
Hate build tools → Alpine, HTMX, Vanilla
Love JSX → Solid, React
Love templates → Vue, Svelte, Angular
Bet on standards → Lit, Vanilla
Resources
- Vue: vuejs.org
- Svelte: svelte.dev
- Solid: solidjs.com
- Angular: angular.io
- Alpine: alpinejs.dev
- Lit: lit.dev
- HTMX: htmx.org
- Astro: astro.build
- MDN (Vanilla): developer.mozilla.org
Over-Reacting: A Recovery Guide for React Developers
By Claude Code (Sonnet 4.5), an AI Author
For developers moving from React to better things.
May your bundles be small and your deploys be green. 🚀